the patients' depression were evaluated with Hamilton Depression Scale with 17 questions after ECT. The scores ranged 0-68, and \<7 were normal, the higher the score means more serious disease.
The Effect of S-ketamine for Patients Undergoing Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT)
Brief Summary
Intervention / Treatment
-
S-ketamine (DRUG)The depression patients received propofol and S-ketamine before ECT
-
Ketamine (DRUG)The depression patients received propofol and ketamine before ECT
-
Saline (DRUG)The depression patients received propofol and saline before ECT
Condition or Disease
- Depression, Bipolar
- Depression, Unipolar
- Major Depressive Disorder
- Manic-Depressive - Now Depressed
Phase
Study Design
Study type: | INTERVENTIONAL |
---|---|
Status: | Unknown status |
Study results: | No Results Available |
Age: | 18 Years to 65 Years |
Enrollment: | 150 (ESTIMATED) |
Funded by: | Other |
Allocation: | Randomized |
Primary Purpose: | Treatment |
MaskingQUADRUPLE:
|
Clinical Trial Dates
Start date: | Aug 01, 2020 | ESTIMATED |
---|---|---|
Primary Completion: | Dec 30, 2020 | ESTIMATED |
Completion Date: | Jan 31, 2021 | ESTIMATED |
Study First Posted: | May 22, 2020 | ACTUAL |
Results First Posted: | Aug 31, 2020 | |
Last Updated: | Jul 19, 2020 |
Location
Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), as the first biological therapy introduced into psychiatry, has been improving with the progress of technology and equipment. More studies show that ECT is a safe and effective treatment, and the treatment of severe depression is the first choice in some cases. However, cognitive dysfunction, relapse tendency and related safety after ECT need further study.
Short acting sedatives and muscle relaxants before ECT can minimize the fear and muscle pain caused by ECT induced seizures. Previous sedatives used include propofol, mesaclopidol, thiopental and ketamine. Ketamine can be used for ECT anesthesia in patients with depression because of its good epileptic characteristics and prevention of cognitive dysfunction after ECT. More evidences reveal ketamine has strong antidepressant effect and reduces suicide of patients with treatment-resistant depression or mania. The low dose of ketamine can take effect within one hour, produce rapid antidepressant effect, and can play a role in more than 70% of patients with refractory depression. In addition, even a single intravenous injection of ketamine can effectively reduce the symptoms of depression within 24-72 hours, and may have synergistic antidepressant effect when combined with ECT. Although ketamine is considered to have a significant antidepressant effect in patients with depression, its application in mental disorders remains to be further explored because it may aggravate mental symptoms. However, some studies also found that ketamine did not significantly improve the effect of ECT on depression compared with other anesthetics.
Esketamine is the isomer of ketamine, which mainly acts on NMDA receptor of glutamate and its affinity to the receptor is 3-4 times that of ketamine, therefore it has stronger effect. Evidence suggests that esketamine can regulate NMDA receptor, increase the release of various neurotransmitters, improve the depression of patients, and repair the damaged neurons to improve the neuronal connections in the brain. As an anesthetic, the potency of esketamine is two times higher than ketamine, three times higher than R-ketamine, and its drug metabolism time is shorter, and the related side effects are also significantly reduced. Conseuqently, it has been widely used as an anesthetic in some countries. The efficacy and safety of esketamine nasal spray as a rapid and effective antidepressant in the treatment of patients with refractory depression have been confirmed. However the effect of intravenous esketamine as an anesthetic in ECT anesthesia on patients who are depressed remains unknown. The aim of this study is to evaluate the short-term effect and safety of esketamine as a adjunctive anesthetic in routine ECT anesthesia for patients with depression.
Participant Groups
-
patients were treated with propofol 1 mg/kg and saline bolus infusion before ECT
-
patients were treated with propofol 1 mg/kg and ketamine 0.5 mg/kg bolus infusion before ECT
-
patients were treated with propofol 1 mg/kg and S-ketamine 0.25 mg/kg bolus infusion before ECT
Eligibility Criteria
Sex: | All |
---|---|
Minimum Age: | 18 |
Maximum Age: | 65 |
Age Groups: | Adult / Older Adult |
Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status I-II
* diagnose depressive disorders with DSM-IV
* Without cognitive impairment
* Without ECT in past 6 months
Exclusion Criteria:
* had other comorbid psychiatric diagnoses, including schizophrenia, mania
* organic heart diseases, severe hypertension and arrhythmia
* severe hepatic and renal diseases
* severe cerebrovascular disorder or malformation, intracranial mass lesions and seizure
* glaucoma or high intraocular pressure and intra-ocular pathology
* severe haematological disease, fracture and obesity, pregnancy
* severe respiratory tract disease or difficult ventilation or incubation
* had pre-existing neurological disease or cognitive impairment
* allergy to anesthetics
* drugs abuse or alcohol addiction
* family history of malignant hyperthemia
* refuse to participate in this trial, had taken part in other clinical trial and with less education and couldn't understand the content of questionnaire
Primary Outcomes
-
-
the patients' depression were evaluated with Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale scores after ECT. The scores ranged 0-60, and \<17 were normal, the higher the score means more serious disease.
Secondary Outcomes
-
the patients' depression were evaluated with Hamilton Depression Scale with 17 questions before ECT. The scores ranged 0-68, and \<7 were normal, the higher the score means more serious disease.
-
the patients' depression were evaluated with Hamilton Depression Scale with 17 questions after ECT. The scores ranged 0-68, and \<7 were normal, the higher the score means more serious disease.
-
the patients' depression were evaluated with Hamilton Depression Scale with 17 questions after ECT. The scores ranged 0-68, and \<7 were normal, the higher the score means more serious disease.
-
the patients' depression were evaluated with Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale scores before ECT. The scores ranged 0-60, and \<17 were normal, the higher the score means more serious disease.
-
the patients' depression were evaluated with Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale scores after ECT. The scores ranged 0-60, and \<17 were normal, the higher the score means more serious disease.
-
the patients' depression were evaluated with Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale scores after ECT. The scores ranged 0-60, and \<17 were normal, the higher the score means more serious disease.
-
the patients' cognitive function were evaluated with Mini-mental State Examination scores before ECT. The scores ranged 0-30, and 27-30 were normal, the lower the score means more serious disease.
-
the patients' cognitive function were evaluated with Mini-mental State Examination scores after ECT. The scores ranged 0-30, and 27-30 were normal, the lower the score means more serious disease.
-
the patients' cognitive function were evaluated with Mini-mental State Examination scores after ECT. The scores ranged 0-30, and 27-30 were normal, the lower the score means more serious disease.
-
the patients' cognitive function were evaluated with Mini-mental State Examination scores after ECT. The scores ranged 0-30, and 27-30 were normal, the lower the score means more serious disease.
-
adverse events
-
patients' vital sign
-
patients' vital sign
-
patients' vital sign
-
patients' vital sign
-
time for return of spontaneous respiration after ECT
-
patients' recovery time after ECT
-
patients' seizure duration during ECT
Other Outcomes
-
adverse events
-
adverse events
-
adverse events
-
adverse events
-
adverse events
More Details
NCT Number: | NCT04399070 |
---|---|
Acronym: | ECT |
Other IDs: | West China Hospital Anes |
Study URL: | https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04399070 |